Sterba’s Logical Argument from Evil and the God Who Walks Away from Omelas
نویسندگان
چکیده
The logical argument from evil, generally thought to have been defused by Alvin Plantinga’s free will defense, has reinvigorated James Sterba’s exposition and defense of a new version the that draws on recent work in moral philosophy. Whereas J.L. Mackie’s uses what can now be seen overly simplistic principles try establish incompatibility between existence God any evil at all, more sophisticated seeks (specifically, Perfect Being Theology) specific sorts our world contains. Here, I provide brief then sketch one possible theistic response argument. On basis discussion, conclude is not decisive as it stands. However, develop revised argue Theist faces following dilemma: she answer only accepting position deeply odds with commonsense morality. Therefore, although does quite succeed, points us direction serious problem for Theism.
منابع مشابه
Cosmological argument in proving the existence of God from Imam Khomeini's (RA) point of view
This article reviews Cosmological argument in proving the existence of God from the viewpoint of Imam Khomeini (RA). At first, various views to the existence of God are reviewed and then its etymology will be reviewed. Cosmological argument proves God through universal premises about truth and world and and the Movement Argument, Casual Argument and Necessity and Possibility Argument are dif...
متن کاملthe role of russia in transmission of energy from central asia and caucuses to european union
پس ازفروپاشی شوروی،رشد منابع نفت و گاز، آسیای میانه و قفقاز را در یک بازی ژئوپلتیکی انرژی قرار داده است. با در نظر گرفتن این منابع هیدروکربنی، این منطقه به یک میدانجنگ و رقابت تجاری برای بازی های ژئوپلتیکی قدرت های بزرگ جهانی تبدیل شده است. روسیه منطقه را به عنوان حیات خلوت خود تلقی نموده و علاقمند به حفظ حضورش می باشد تا همانند گذشته گاز طبیعی را به وسیله خط لوله مرکزی دریافت و به عنوان یک واس...
15 صفحه اولThinking as Evidence for the Probability of the Existence of a God: An Argument from Unnaturalness for Necessity
The objective of this article is to show that it is justified to assert that the existence of God is plausible, considering the fact that thinking itself is an immediate outcome (effect) of a thinker (cause). This idea may seem evident, but it is in fact challenged by certain claims of cognitive philosophers who aver that our knowledge of necessity and causation is, i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Religions
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2077-1444']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13090782